<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>in the wrong line</title>
  <link>https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>in the wrong line - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:34:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>misqueue</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/13744.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:34:16 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>the telos of tagging</title>
  <link>https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/13744.html</link>
  <description>Maybe I&apos;ve simply been on the internet far too long (I remember when images were the newest, bleeding edge browser feature!), but when tagging came about on livejournal, I thought it was awesome. Then Twitter did the hashtags, and that was neat-o (especially when google picked it up with G+, too), and tumblr has its system (which I don&apos;t fully understand), and AO3 implemented tagging awesomely too--it&apos;s great to help you find the fics you&apos;re looking for. I love that you can nest tags on Dreamwidth (presumably lj has this too), and it&apos;s a really great way to organize and make accessible content for readers and users--and yourself.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Except now it seems like people have lost the plot and forgot what tags are actually &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;They&apos;re for organizing and flagging data&lt;/i&gt;, so when people put commentary in their tags, or use their tags for a summary, or pretty much tag things with any single use tag they will never use again (and neither will anyone else), it&apos;s bad practice and unhelpful and it makes me a little bit cranky. A good tag has semantic content: it&apos;s descriptive and helpful and points the reader to the content it describes, and it has the potential to be used more than once.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I say all this knowing full well I&apos;m terrible about tagging consistently, and I can get all kinds of dysfunctionally obsessive about it, but I do try.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;ETA&lt;/b&gt; this is mostly in response to seeing tumblr style tagging on AO3.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seriously though, I am way too prone to this:&lt;span class=&quot;cut-wrapper&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;display: none;&quot; id=&quot;span-cuttag___1&quot; class=&quot;cuttag&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;b class=&quot;cut-open&quot;&gt;(&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b class=&quot;cut-text&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/13744.html#cutid1&quot;&gt;XKCD: Duty Calls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b class=&quot;cut-close&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;display: none;&quot; id=&quot;div-cuttag___1&quot; aria-live=&quot;assertive&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=misqueue&amp;ditemid=13744&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/13744.html</comments>
  <category>internet: good practice</category>
  <category>blather</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/8936.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Is Web 2.0 design rolling back to the 90&apos;s?</title>
  <link>https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/8936.html</link>
  <description>What is this web design trend of low contrast pastel text on pastel backgrounds in tiny &lt;small&gt;tiny&lt;/small&gt; fonts? Has no one heard of accessibility in good web design? I mean, it&apos;s an improvement on neon purple cursive fonts on dark, repeating, non-tiling background images with animated torches bracketing every header tag, but still. It&apos;s 2012, folks should know better. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Argh, my eyes. To writers who do this where they post stories? You&apos;re reducing your potential readership.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=misqueue&amp;ditemid=8936&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://misqueue.dreamwidth.org/8936.html</comments>
  <category>blather</category>
  <category>internet: good practice</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
